A trial is now scheduled for February, much to the relief of the plaintiffs and their attorney, who expressed hope for justice.

According to Billboard, in her 54-page decision, U.S. District Court Judge Aleta A. Trauger highlighted that questions surrounding allegations of Bassnectar’s awareness of the plaintiffs’ ages are best suited for a jury to determine.

The plaintiffs—Rachel Ramsbottom, Alexis Bowling and Jenna Houston—have each shared their accounts of alleged wrongdoing by the DJ. Notably, Ramsbottom described illicit interactions allegedly starting when she was 17 and Ashton was 34, while Bowling claimed she was invited to meet him under allegedly deceptive circumstances.

Judge Trauger pointed out that testimonies and evidence surrounding the plaintiffs’ ages complicate the case, emphasizing that the determination of Bassnectar’s alleged willful ignorance should fall to a jury.

“The court finds that whether this money constituted payment or remuneration for sex constitutes a jury question,” she remarked, acknowledging the complexities within the allegations.

The ruling is a pivotal moment in a case that has become emblematic of the intersection between celebrity and accountability in a broader cultural context. Bassnectar, who has consistently denied the accusations, faces a trial that may significantly impact his legacy and career.

Photo Credit is Mehreen Rizvi.